The murder case of an 11 year old girl was solved using DNA from one yellow sock.
This story about Terri Lynn Hollis is amazing (and of course very sad) in so many ways. USA Today reports in their story: “Southern California investigators have solved the murder of an 11-year-old girl, nearly five decades after her Thanksgiving Day kidnapping.”
I am amazed that law enforcement continued to work the murder of Terri Hollis for nearly 50 years. What kind of dedication does it take to keep the case open and scanning DNA to solve this cold case? I am absolutely amazed and thankful.
This article goes on to say, “Genetic genealogy identified Jake Edward Brown, who died in 2003, as the suspect in the disappearance and death of Terri Lynn Hollis, authorities said Wednesday.”
The law enforcement community (police, judges, forensic experts, etc.) know that DNA is a specific blueprint of a person.
Why don’t evolutionist?
Think about this. Law enforcement can identify the person who left cells from his/her body by tracking down and comparing their DNA.
- This is the same unique DNA code that constructed your entire body from conception and told each cell where to go and what to do.
- This is the same unique DNA that created itself from a mud puddle called primordial soup.
When examining is evolution a theory, ask yourself these two questions:
- Logically asking: How could this complex code that is so unique that no one on this earth has it just evolve out of a primordial soup? My comment: The materialist and evolutionist claim that organic DNA code and its receptors, that interpret and act on that code, originated from inorganic rock and water. Inorganic chemicals creating and interpreting code does not fit reality.
- Scientifically asking: What force or chemical reaction could motivate inorganic matter to produce organic matter and then such a complex code of 4 chemical to reproduce life? My comments: For anything to happen, something (a physical, thermal, or chemical force – a cause) must make an effect occur. Inorganic chemicals, with no purpose or motivation, creating code and interpreting code does not fit reality.
What am I trying to communicate? I am trying to get you to question the theory of evolution by asking you to bring some reality into the theory of evolution. Could a mud puddle really create a chemical code like DNA? Really?
Is Evolution A Theory questions the logical and scientific reality of the theory of evolution to be true and fit the reality on this planet.