The Spectator published an article entitled, “Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers“. this article stated, “In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19.”
But many people ask the question is this true and how did the researchers come to this conclusion? This is the question I ask about evolutionary scientist. Are they ignoring something?
Days later, Full Facts produced an article entitled, “Danish study on mask efficacy only tells us half the story“. This article stated, “The headline on the article was originally “Landmark Danish study shows face masks have no significant effect”; this was subsequently changed following criticism to “Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers” (our emphasis). This distinction is important.”
So, you are asking how does this relate to Is Evolution A Theory? Go back to my question to evolutionary scientist above. Another version of the same question: How can evolutionary scientist ignore the many laws of nature that conflict with the theory of evolution?
As any parent knows, truth is DIFFICULT to find when two brothers are telling their side of the same “brotherly” encounter. Well, truth is EASY to find when you are referring to laws of nature. Why? Because there cannot be a conflict between laws of nature and scientific theories. If there is, one of the laws of the theory is in error. All laws of nature and scientific theories MUST be compatible. The theory of evolution is NOT compatible with many laws of nature.
Simply put, when two theories are not compatible, one must be wrong. This is the Law of Non-Contradiction. Explore this site and make up your own mind on whether evolution is a legitimate theory. Go to our Start Here page and begin examining the scientific evidence on why the theory of evolution is failed.