According to Phys Org, evolutionary scientist are still debating the speed of evolution. Did it happen gradually as proposed by Charles Darwin or did it occur spontaneously as proposed by Jay Gould?
You can read more about this debate by visiting the University of Vermont’s Evolution 101 page here (which is where I obtained the below graphic).
Here is the question presented in Phys Org’s article entitled, The most popular textbook example of punctuated evolution debunked:
“Evolutionary biologists have for a long time disagreed on the rate of evolution when new species emerge. Are new species the result of gradual changes—as Charles Darwin suggested—or is evolution speeding up for short periods of time when new species evolve?”
Can you answer the question? Is Evolution A Theory can answer the question. Neither.
The reason is simple; the theory of evolution violates many laws of nature. You may ask, “Which laws?” If this is your question, see our Laws, Theories, and Principles of Science page by clicking here. There is an entire list.
A better questions to ask is,”Which laws of nature is the Theory of Evolution compatible with?” There are none.
If you don’t believe it, I understand. I believed in the Theory of Evolution too. But then I started to learn about the Laws of Nature (Laws of Science) at an Engineering University. I learned how to apply these laws to real life and designing things that humans need.
I discovered evolution was not compatible with any Law of Nature and started thinking thoroughly. Now I have this site, Is Evolution A Theory, and am trying to tell others what I have discovered.
The Theory of Evolution is not a theory because it is incompatible with the known Laws of Science and Nature. In other words, it violates the definition of “Theory”. Simple as that.